Untitled

heartsways:

eleanor89:

heartsways:

thingsfrommyhead replied to your post:A confession, of sorts…

I wish this had a re-blog option!!! I agree with everything you send bar one thing. I think Rumpel did know that Emma’s kiss would wake Henry. He knew Regina used the sleeping potion and he knew the way to break that dark…

Look, I don’t know where you have looked, but pretty much me and all the dearies that I follow where really sorry for Regina and angry at Rumple for what he did. But for  Rumple, I’m sure he knew that Emma was going to kiss Henry, because 

A) he rushed to bring the magic back. No reason to do it if the whole town wasn’t about to remember and go ballistic on him and Regina. 

B) he told Belle she was going to know him.

C) he knew the curse was about to be broken and only a kiss of true love could do it. Only a kiss from Emma. And who was the person who needed a kiss? Henry. I think that many here on tumblr foresaw the same. 

For taking the magic back, I’m sure it’s partly because how else could he find Bae? And how else could he protect himself from the town that now remembers?

Also, he’s still power-hungry now that he has an excuse to bring magic back. I didn’t like his expression at all. I think Belle will leave him and I think he’ll make many mistakes. I don’t even go if he’ll go in fully villain mode next season or if the writers will surprise us. I love him and I interpreted the situation like this, but it doesn’t mean that at the end of the episode I didn’t want to throw stuff at him!

1) Manipulating everyone to get them in place like little chess pieces

2) Murdering people because he saw them as a threat (his maid), or just an annoyance (turned a man into a snail and squashed him - FOR NO REASON)

3) Broke the heart of his ‘true love’ by choosing power over her

4) Chose power over his son - repeatedly and then blamed the fairies for ‘taking’ Bae away from him

I’m prety sure these aren’t the only examples I could give, but what constitutes “full villain” mode to you?  Murder, cheating, tricking and greed pretty much do it for me.

But I didn’t like Regina’s smirk neither or how she dismissed Jefferson even when she now knew how he felt all the time. For me they both didn’t learn very much, because they are too happy that magic is back and it doesn’t look like they are going to be good with it. They both deserve an happy ending for me. I wanted them both to have their sons telling them they loved them, and you have no idea how much I hoped Henry would say “I love you too” as soon as the curse was broken, because he looked conflicted when Regina told him she loves him. During the episode I cried both when Rumple and Regina cried. During the episode I hoped for another villain because the ones we have are both too broken for me to route against them for real. 

Well, in all fairness, nobody REALLY knows what Regina’s smirk means.  My best guess is that at last she might finally have some power, considering she’s pretty much lost everything she ever had.  She even sacrificed her last bit of magic so her joy at seeing magic might have something to do with the fact that now, she stands a fighting chance instead of being stripped of anything and everything that was important to her.  Yes; one can argue that Regina did it to herself (as Henry asserted in her dream and, I suggest, is rumbling around Regina’s subconscious somewhere as self-hatred), but when you think about it, she was destined for this.  The deals her mother made?  I wonder who they were with.  Hm.  Let’s see, shall we?  Who’s the person who cuts deals that ONLY ever benefit himself?  Hm.  *strokes chin thoughtfully* 

See, you are an evil regal

I am?  When did this happen?  Just because Regina’s my favourite character doesn’t mean I’m anything other than a fan of Regina. But please, feel free to pigeonhole me if it makes your argument any more cohesive.

and saw Regina “no, no!” in the hospital as a way to say “no, the curse is broken, I’ll lose Henry!”, I saw it as a “No, the curse is broken, my victory is gone!”. You saw Rumple taking magic as only a way to go back to his fairy-self, I saw that as a way to put him and Belle in safe and be able to find Bae (and also as a way to have power, it’s not like Rumple is an hero!).

Again, you appear to know a LOT more about my thoughts and feelings than I do, apparently.  I love discussion, you know.  I love heated, impassioned people who will argue their corner and come up with points that make ME think and make ME consider my own side of things.  But don’t assume to know what’s in my head.  I’m perfectly capable of expressing that for myself, thanks.

As a matter of fact, I saw Regina’s “no, no” as someone who knows that she’s lost.  That’s as open to interpretation as I want to make it, or as you want to make it. 

For me the episode the Stranger showed that he already changed a lot from the Dark One of the first days,

How, exactly?  Because he expressed sorrow over losing his son?   

but it doesn’t mean that I’m excusing him. He’ll have lot of reasons to give and I’ll yell at him (mentally) all he time. And for Regina, the fact that I saw her as not wanting to lose the curse because she hates everyone doesn’t mean that I didn’t cry all my tears when she was crying on the pillow, that I didn’t saw how broken she is and that I didn’t want someone to help her.

So I love both of them, I excuse some things to both of them and others not (again, this goes for both of them), and exactly like your opinion on Rumple as evil doesn’t have anything to do with Rumple’s gender, my opinion on her doesn’t have anything to do with gender either.

No, I rather think my opinion on Rumples as evil DOES have a lot to do with gender.  Comparing the two characters without acknowledging that is an exercise in futility because my PRIMARY points were concerned with the fact that a bad woman and a bad man get treated ENTIRELY differently by television shows and, more worryingly, by the people that watch them and those in fandom that talk about them.  If you think that my opinions in the original post weren’t connected to the patriarchal hegemony and the support of which runs rampant throughout fandom (and ESPECIALLY this one) then I apologise for not making myself clear.

This is ABSOLUTELY about gender.  Evil can be attributed to BOTH characters, and I’m kind of done arguing who’s right and who’s wrong and why so-and-so did what to whom, etc.  What I wanted to point out is that from the second the show finished, there was a surge of “He’s got Belle!  Hurrah!  He’s bringing magic back!  Hurrah!”  and, alternatively, “She got what she deserved.  She deserves to be alone.  She’s a terrible mother and I hope she dies.” 

Or something along those lines… 

And I saw lots of people really believing in Regina even before this episode. (In the confessions sites, though, there is hate for everyone and every ship).

I don’t even know it that made sense. I just wanted to tell you that Rumple fans can still love him but saw how Regina loves Henry and in my case love her too, but maybe I made things worse? When I read you explaining and defending her I did the same with him, but I also hope that it was clear what I saw in her! There doesn’t need to be a war between evil regals and dearies for me, because we can love both or only one without having to bring the other up.

Oh, believe me dear, there’s no war.  I’m about as interested in fandom politics as I am in removing my own teeth.  My original post was about the PERCEPTION of the CHARACTERS in a socio-sexual context.  I couldn’t really care any less about shipping wars.  I just…I don’t care, sorry. 

Like yesterday, when someone made a horrible confession against Golden Swan shippers and a Golden Swan shipper assumed it was a Rumbeller because this fandom is full of crazy, we Rumbellers told her we had no idea of what was going on, talked about it and agreed that can all be love&peace because we aren’t all insane. I think that it should go like that between dearies and evil regals, especially because I follow a lot of Rumbellers and Dearies and I don’t see much hate for Regina, surely not more than the hate for Rumple from the evil regals. And it’s really awkward for me because even if Rumple is my favourite, I love Regina too, but reading everytime that we are idiots (not from you) for liking him more than her, makes me hard to see her positive traits and it’s just in posts like this that I remember that I love both of them. Maybe it’s the same with you, just with Rumplestiltskin? 

No, it’s not the same.  I can’t stand the character, especially because of the glorification of someone who is morally bankrupt, selfish, greedy and hasn’t convinced me he feels one iota of love.  I love Robert Carlyle, and I love the way he plays Rumpelstiltskin, but I simply can’t sit by and watch while the male figure is elevated and the female figure is demeaned.  Regardless of who they are or what they’ve done, THAT’S something that television shouldn’t be teaching us.  And THAT’S why I posted.  It was about sexism and misogyny, not about shipping wars, for god’s sakes.  I don’t care who ships whom; if it makes you happy, ship everyone with everyone.  But the underlying message of this show is one that gives me cause for concern.  That’s what I was trying to say and, if I failed to do that and prompted your response, then I apologise.  Because all I see you doing here is precisely what I pointed out in my original post: if Rumpel and Regina are basically the same, then why are their characters treated so differently?

Did these people miss Henry saying that bringing the magic back was “something bad”?

chrisdee:

I believe this was the first of the parody motivation posters that became a staple in the CT forums. Dedicated to all those fanboys (and a few fangirls) who bought into the idea that big tits meant shallow and sexist characterization and small tits, no matter how demeaning and insulting the portrayal, was brilliantly complex and sophisticated.

One of those analogies that has stuck with me ever since :)

chrisdee:

I believe this was the first of the parody motivation posters that became a staple in the CT forums. Dedicated to all those fanboys (and a few fangirls) who bought into the idea that big tits meant shallow and sexist characterization and small tits, no matter how demeaning and insulting the portrayal, was brilliantly complex and sophisticated.

One of those analogies that has stuck with me ever since :)

vinneh:

tastefullyoffensive:

[via]

I would rather watch this than the Battleship movie tbh. :U

vinneh:

tastefullyoffensive:

[via]

I would rather watch this than the Battleship movie tbh. :U

islandedinastreamofstars:

this thursday night at 10pm EST love-capn-raydor and i will be on the femslash4fans radio show talking about brenda/sharon! really hope y’all tune in; we’ve seen the questions, and i think it’s going to be a really interesting conversation. more info below:

lesstitsnass:

Thanks so much for the shout-out, Gail, and also for adding to the list of tumblrs I should be following! :D

gailsimone:

Figures I should post some posts about tumblrs that actually do present cool, funny, interesting, meaningful and positive portrayals of females in comics.

This isn’t a long list, I’m missing a bunch I’m sure, hopefully people can make some recommendations? Anyway, these are a few I have been looking at a lot, lately, and enjoying very much.  I bet you will, too, regardless of gender.


[…]

1) This site is nothing but gorgeous pieces of art featuring female superheroes. Lovely selection, quite droolworthy!

http://women-centric-comics.tumblr.com/

2) Very cool site that redraws oddball female superhero anatomy with more realistic poses, from the perspective of a storyboard artist. Good stuff (and I think a couple book I’ve worked on are in there).

http://lesstitsnass.tumblr.com/

3)Tumblr of the great Osborn and Supergirl writer, Kelly Sue DeConnick, a terrific writer and commentator.

http://kellysue.tumblr.com/

4) The incomparable Kate Beaton, simply an amazing talent who is already a superstar:

http://beatonna.tumblr.com/

5) Points out bizarre anatomy on female characters with intelligent commentary:

http://eschergirls.tumblr.com/

6) One of my favorites, does regular, scrupulous reporting of females in comics, both characters and creators.

http://www.ladiesmakingcomics.com/

racethewind10:

Or as I like to say “The four most boring reasons they could have possibly picked.”  (Not that those reason’s aren’t valid of course. They’re just really obvious and I don’t think they adequately explain why Warehouse 13 is so popular)

How about “Race’s 4 reasons why Warehouse 13 continues (or at least we are assuming it will continue) to kick ass and top the Sci Fi Genre”


1. It’s a smart show, that doesn’t take itself too seriously. Yes, we as fans love really smart shows, but - much like the long running Stargate SG 1 - Warehouse 13 appeals to people who love history, science, literature, mystery, while still being funny. It laughs at itself and it includes the fans in that humor. Its uplifting, not degrading. It celebrates intelligence while still admitting, “yeah, most of us feel kind of (or really) awkward sometimes.” 

2. It has avoided the (almost always) overdone cliche of “leading man/leading woman SEXUAL TENSION.”  Let’s face it, unless the show is Castle or Fringe this trope is generally a recipe for disaster as shows run the UST into the ground, or drag it out forever until fans are just throwing up their hands in frustration.  Pete and Myka are the world’s best Bromance, brother/sister relationship and its perfect.  It allows for sweet, sometimes emotional moments but doesn’t drag the show into territory it doesn’t need to be in. 

3.  It has an equal number of varied, three-dimensional, kickass female characters. (Even if I would like to see more of Leena). I cannot stress enough how freaking happy this makes me. Even if I still want to kick Jack Kenny when he gives interviews and sounds surprised when saying things like, “the show has a really high female viewership.” OF COURSE IT DOES. FANGIRLS EXIST DAMNIT. And if you give us smart, fun TV that doesn’t degrade or marginalize women, and *gasp* allows them to be heroes too, OMG WE WILL WATCH IT.  (I know, shocking right?)

4. H. G. Wells. Yeah that’s right. She’s on this list. Know why? Because I tried watching Warehouse 13 in the first season. My reaction? “Meh.”  Not bad, just not interested. And then the show gave us H.G. Wells. Helena G. Wells, with her utter brilliance and tragic past, her complicated motives and Jaime Murray’s subtext with Joanne Kelly. And I was hooked.  If it were not for this character, I never would have given Warehouse 13 a second thought. Instead, it has taken over a ridiculous amount of my life and I am counting down the days till the Season 3 DVDs come out, and Season 4 premiers. 

5. (Because I couldn’t resist) Jinks coming out to Pete. Because I cannot think of one single instance on an American TV show where one male character comes out to another (straight) male character and the response is “awesome.”

The one who knows

I’m not clear why everyone seems to think Regina is “the one” just because of the opening montage. Why would they make a vague reference to “one person” if they wanted it to be obvious? Why not “one woman”? Never mind that all of her actions can be explained without resorting to the supernatural. Or that Mr. Gold makes a lot more sense. SOMEBODY planted the idea of a curse in Henry’s head. Wouldn’t it stand to reason the “one” did? And obviously Regina would not have. If you think Gold remembers, then either Regina does not, or two people know and the opening montage is false…but then you can’t rely on ANYTHING from the montage.

I think I got Tumblr just to make it easier to follow @askswanqueen.

I do not have the first idea to use Tumblr, now that I have an account. Instructions would be nice, guys.